Canadian Homeopathic Conference- continued

November 2nd, 2011
by paul

The next guests were Dr. Prasanta Banerji and Dr. Pratip Banerji from India. They spoke on the topic of the “Banerji Cancer Protocol”.

 Recurrence of brain tumors after surgery, radiation and chemotherapy is a common problem, although many conventional and alternative therapies are available. Recently, their treatment of brain tumors with the homeopathic remedies Ruta and Calcarea Phosphorica have gained popularity in India, and most of their patients are using their treatment without any other form of conventional intervention. In other countries, their treatment is being used mainly to prevent recurrences. Having analyzed 147 cases in many countries around the world, the results show that these medicines have a definite role in preventing the recurrence of brain tumors in 66.74% of cases.

 They have used the “scientific” approach and international standards to allow verifiability of the research data. This has made their research acceptable to the international scientific community studying various treatments of cancer.

Tags: ,
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Canadian Homeopathic Conference

November 2nd, 2011
by paul

The first ever Canadian Homeopathic Conference was held in Toronto on October 21, 22, 23, 2011. The theme of the conference was “Coming Together”, and from this aspect it was a great success. It brought together for the first time homeopaths from around Ontario, together with guest speakers from England, India, Cuba, USA and Ireland.

The first guest was Dr. Lionel Milgrom, from London, England, who has been a professional homeopath (LCH, MARH, RHom) for 12 years, and for over 30 years a research chemist (PhD, CChem, FRSC) with many published academic papers.

 Dr. Milgrom’s talk was titled ‘Science or Scientism? Deconstructing Skeptics: Rattling Cages’. He postulates ‘Are homeopathy and science doomed to always be at each other’s throats? That depends on what we mean by science’. He lead us to consider what science is, what it isn’t, and how and why it has been misinterpreted by skeptics in the media and elsewhere. We learned that this is the reason homeopathy is dismissed as ‘unscientific’, ‘unethical’, even ‘dangerous’ and ‘deadly’.

 Milgrom deconstructed the skeptical notions by examining the evidence for homeopathy. He examined recent research using homeopathic treatment in patients with active yet relatively stable rheumatoid arthritis. Uncovering the assumptions behind RCTs (randomized controlled trials) shows a new understanding of how RCTs allow knowledge ONLY of the medicine OR the consultation, but not BOTH at the same time.

Tomorrow I will summarize the “Banerji Cancer Protocol” which outlines how the recurrence of Brain Tumors may be prevented with specific homeopathic remedies.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Health Show Updates

May 25th, 2011
by paul

Buy Radiation Protection has been busy in the month of May. On May 7, 2011 we attended a trade show in Peterborough, Ontario. The Peterborough Wellness Expo was a great success! Highlights included many booths dedicated to health, and a talk by Dr. Magda Havas on the dangers of radiation and cell phones. We plan to attend this important community event next year. The following weekend, May 13-15, we attended the Ultimate Women’s Show in Hamilton, Ontario. This show was bigger and had more traffic, however the theme was not wellness or health, but rather a general overall show for women. Consequently, the results were not nearly as good as the show in Peterborough, even though it was a 3 day event. On the positive side, we managed to get the word out on the dangers of radiation and cell phones through flyers, business cards, and product demonstrations. There was lots of interest, but sales were low. This was a new market for us, and it will take some time for the word to spread in this area. Positive contacts were made, and we were invited to future health shows in Oakville for the fall of 2011. Stay tuned for dates and locations.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Cell Phone Headaches?

March 6th, 2011
by paul

Are you living in a safe place? A recent CBC story relates how a total of 20 cell phone antennas were installed on the top of one apartment building in the west end of Toronto. This is becoming a common sight in cities around the world. There are over 7,500 cell phone antennas in Toronto alone. These antennas were installed in 2009.

Soon afterwards, and unknown to each other, the tenants living in the top 3 penthouse apartments on the 8th floor started getting sick with a variety of symptoms. One tenant said it started with Tinnitus (ringing in the ears). Another tenant complained of poor sleep, chronic fatigue, and tooth pain. Yet another had numb hands and feet, tinnitus, confused thinking and skin rashes. None of these people had these types of health problems before the antennas were installed.

One tenant, Carolyn, admits to using cell phones and computers on a regular basis. The CBC asks why, if this person was already a regular user of electronics, did she not develop these symptoms sooner? The answer is that low frequency radiation, or EMF’s, has a cumulative effect on the body. EMF’s, or extremely low frequency radiation (ELFR) change the body’s immune system frequency to higher than normal. The normal range is 6-9 Hertz. When we are exposed to this type of radiation, it slowly accumulates over time. What has likely happened in this case is that the new antennas pushed her limit of exposure over the edge, to the point of causing symptoms to occur. This is a common problem I have seen in dozens of cases I have dealt with.

Another tenant, Veronica, and her daughter, noticed that when they were not in the apartment, the symptoms disappeared. For example, they would go away for the weekend and they felt fine. When they came back home, the symptoms came back. This is similar to the case of 12 schools in central Ontario that installed WiFi networks just last year. The students reported similar symptoms, and what the parents started noticing is that these symptoms went away when the kids were home for the weekend, or off on summer vacation. Veronica explained “I’ve got feelings and pains that I’ve never had before. I’ve lived here for the past 12 years”.

Veronica’s apartment was checked by Magda Havas, professor of Environmental and Resource studies at Trent University. The radiation levels were so high, the meter that Dr. Havas was using shut off. The CBC asks why, if that was the case, did not everyone else in the building develop symptoms? The answer is that EMF’s create an individual response in each person. Children are more susceptible since their brains and immune systems are still developing. The exposure levels drop with distance. Therefore, the tenants living on lower floors are not as highly exposed and are less vulnerable.

All of the tenants started talking to each other, and found out about each other’s health problems. They complained to the management, who assured them that the cell phone antennas were safe. According to Health Canada, “there is no scientific evidence that those kind of effects are caused by the energy limits that these people are exposed to”.

Unfortunately, all of the people living on the upper floor chose to move out due to health concerns. They knew of no other way to protect themselves. Had they been aware of Buy Radiation Protection.Com, they could have found a way to shield themselves from EMF’s and Extremely Low Frequency Radiation, by wearing a Lotus Shield.
For more information, visit our website.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Radiation Protection Products

February 10th, 2011
by paul

Any questions or comments about this page?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (1)

Radiation Protection Facts

February 10th, 2011
by paul

Any questions or comments about this page?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (1)

Radiation Protection Answers

February 10th, 2011
by paul

Any questions or comments about this page?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Electromagnetic Radiation/Testing

February 10th, 2011
by paul

Any questions or comments about this page?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Radiation Protection

February 10th, 2011
by paul

Any questions or comments about this page?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Is Wi-Fi Safe For Schools?

January 31st, 2011
by paul

Recently, stories have surfaced out of Central Ontario, Canada revealing how children are getting sick from simply going to school. What is it about these institutions that is causing a problem? The common denominator is that Wi-fi networks have just been installed in schools that never had them before. Since then, the kids are reporting unexplained incidences of heart racing, headaches, nausea and skin rashes.

Strangely enough, these symptoms disappear when the kids are home for the weekend, or off on summer vacation. Is this a coincidence? Not at all.

Health Canada’s Official Position

According to Beth Pieterson of Health Canada “There is no evidence, scientific evidence, that those kind of effects are caused by the energy limits the kids are exposed to by Wi-Fi.”
Safety standards in Canada are set by a document known as Safety Code 6. The fact is that some people react to this radiation at levels well below Safety Code 6. The standards and safety levels are outdated, and Canadians need new studies and limits set to protect adults and children from this increasingly common form of radiation.

Do Electromagnetic Fields Affect Health?

As a rebuttal to Health Canada’s official position, I would like to offer evidence from various sources that EMF’s do in fact affect health, in an extremely negative way.

1. Books, such as “Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields: The Question of Cancer”, by: Bary W. Wilson, Richard G. Stevens, Larry E. Anderson, conclude that
“The primary biological effects of nonionizing electromagnetic radiation probably do not include direct genetic damage. More subtle and indirect forms of action, which include disruption of chronobiological relationships, are certainly involved.
In entrained, synchronized metabolic and biochemical pathways, the disruptions of cyclic processes affect many biological functions, decreasing the effectiveness of therapeutic drug treatment, producing affective mood disorders, decreasing mental and physical well-being, and impairing immunocompetence”. (our immune system).

2. Reports, such as the “International Interphone Study” found “a 40% increased risk of glioma (a type of brain tumor that affects the glial cells in the brain) for those who used a cell phone for at least 1,640 hours with the highest risk for tumors in the temporal lobe and on the same side of the head that one exposes to the cell phone. In other words most of the tumors occurred in the part of the brain receiving the greatest radiation for those who had the longest exposure”.

3. You-tube videos, such as the interview with Dr. George Carlo, point out
 -the Dangers of Wi-Fi, and how our immune systems become compromised, which makes you more susceptible to other exposures
- He talks about how children in middle schools or high schools may be there for 3-4 years, which is bad enough for exposure, but also the problem is far greater for teachers who may be in those same schools for periods of 25-40 years
-For them, we are talking about chronic exposure to something that is very dangerous

4. Live Blood Cell Analysis, which show the before and after effects of Extremely Low Frequency Radiation (ELFR) exposure. A patient with exposure to radiation has their blood examined under a microscope. We observe that their blood cells are clustered, over-lapping, and lacking movement. In a healthy patient, the cells should be un-clustered, there is less over-lapping, and the cells flow normally.

5. Clinical results. I routinely test patients in my clinic for the effects of Extremely Low Frequency Radiation. This type of radiation gets stored in the body slowly, over time, and increases the frequency of your immune system to higher than normal. These results can be seen using a Vega machine, Biofeedback machine, Radionics, Eagle Test, Electrodermal Screening, and Dowsing Rods.

In Conclusion, we can only deduct that Wi-Fi networks are not safe in schools. Wi-Fi networks emit low frequency radiation that is harmful to our health. Children are more susceptible because their brains and immune systems are still developing. The good news is there are Testing, Treatment, and Radiation Protection Products available to combat the negative effects of this highly destructive technology.

For more information, visit www.buyradiationprotection.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (1)